Discourse Preferences in Dynamic Logic

نویسندگان

  • Jan Jaspars
  • Megumi Kameyama
چکیده

In order to enrich dynamic semantic theories with a ‘pragmatic’ capacity, we combine dynamic and nonmonotonic (preferential) logics in a modal logic setting. We extend a fragment of Van Benthem and De Rijke’s dynamic modal logic with additional preferential operators in the underlying static logic, which enables us to define defeasible (pragmatic) entailments over a given piece of discourse. We will show how this setting can be used for a dynamic logical analysis of preferential resolutions of ambiguous pronouns in discourse.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Indefeasible Semantics and Defeasible Pragmatics

An account of utterance interpretation in discourse needs to face the issue of how the discourse context controls the space of interacting preferences. Assuming a discourse processing architecture that distinguishes the grammar and pragmatics subsystems in terms of monotonic and nonmonotonic inferences, I will discuss how independently motivated default preferences interact in the interpretatio...

متن کامل

Versatility of 'Continuations' in Discourse Semantics

We show in this paper how the computer science concept of ’continuations’, together with categorial grammars and a type shifting mechanism, is able to account for a wide range of natural language semantic phenomena, such as hierarchical discourse structure, ellipses, accommodation and free-focus and bound-focus anaphora. The merit of continuations in the dynamic semantics framework is that they...

متن کامل

Preference-Based Argumentation Handling Dynamic Preferences Built on Prioritized Logic Programming

To treat dynamic preferences correctly is crucially required in the fields of argumentation as well as nonmonotonic reasoning. To meet such requirements, first, we propose a hierarchical Prioritized Logic Program (or a hierarchical PLP, for short), which enhances the formalism of Sakama and Inoue’s PLP so that it can represent and reason about dynamic preferences. Second, using such a hierarchi...

متن کامل

Reasoning about Dynamic Preferences in Circumscriptive Theory by Logic Programming

To treat dynamic preferences correctly is inevitably required in the legal reasoning. In this paper, we present a method which enables us to handle some class of dynamic preferences in the framework of circumscription and to compute consistently its metalevel and object-level reasoning by expressing them in an extended logic program. This is achieved on the basis of policy axioms and priority a...

متن کامل

A Type Reduction from Proof-conditional to Dynamic Semantics

Dynamic and proof-conditional approaches to discourse (exemplified by Discourse Representation Theory and Type-Theoretical Grammar, respectively) are related through translations and transitions labeled by first-order formulas with anaphoric twists. Type-theoretic contexts are defined relative to a signature and instantiated model-theoretically, subject to change.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره cmp-lg/9707004  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997